Maz you have a clear tendency to want to protect UCLA and its
current coaches against any and all questioners or detractors. Others simply
want UCLA to have the best coaches whether they are currently on staff or not.
Or to win. There are pros and cons to each viewpoint. And there are other valid ways
to look at it all. Some just come here for entertainment.
Please would you let the rest of us know your actual training, expertise and credentials:
1) As an attorney?
2) As a private investigator?
3) In law enforcement jurisdictional disputes?
4) In NCAA rules regarding permitted and forbidden financial contributions?
I ask because several posters have suggested that it is prudent to allow
for the possibility that UCLA just might be ensnared in the current ongoing FBI investigations.
I also ask because I invited the FBI to speak to the staff at my office one day.
One of our executives arrived a few minutes late to the meeting and he apologized
quickly with a laugh, protesting very amiably: "Don't worry, I'm clean, I'm clean" as he sat down.
The FBI agent in charge responded very drily: 'Nobody is clean.'
That sure got everyone's attention. Maybe you should give it some thought.
current coaches against any and all questioners or detractors. Others simply
want UCLA to have the best coaches whether they are currently on staff or not.
Or to win. There are pros and cons to each viewpoint. And there are other valid ways
to look at it all. Some just come here for entertainment.
Please would you let the rest of us know your actual training, expertise and credentials:
1) As an attorney?
2) As a private investigator?
3) In law enforcement jurisdictional disputes?
4) In NCAA rules regarding permitted and forbidden financial contributions?
I ask because several posters have suggested that it is prudent to allow
for the possibility that UCLA just might be ensnared in the current ongoing FBI investigations.
I also ask because I invited the FBI to speak to the staff at my office one day.
One of our executives arrived a few minutes late to the meeting and he apologized
quickly with a laugh, protesting very amiably: "Don't worry, I'm clean, I'm clean" as he sat down.
The FBI agent in charge responded very drily: 'Nobody is clean.'
That sure got everyone's attention. Maybe you should give it some thought.
